Full text in pdf format

 

Estimates of breed average direct, maternal and heterosis effects for some productive traits of swine in the mexican tropics

 

 

P. Chimal; J.C. Segura

Facultad Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia, Universidad Autonom de Yucatan, Apartado Postal 4-116, Merida Yucatan, 97100, Mexico. Send correspondence to J.C.S.

 

 


ABSTRACT

Records from 2985 purebred and crossbred litters farrowed in a commercial farm in the southeast of Mexico were analyzed. A multiple regression procedure was used to obtain estimates of breed average direct, breed maternal, and direct and maternal heterosis effects for the Duroc (D), Hampshire (H), American Landrace (L) and Yorkshire (Y) breeds and their crosses. Average direct and maternal effects were expressed as deviations from the Y breed. Average direct effects for litter size and weight at birth and litter size at weaning did not differ significantly among breeds although, in general, the Y breed was the best. Landrace average effect for litter weight at weaning was large and significant (P < 0.05). Breed maternal effects for all preweaning traits were in general small for the D and H breeds, but large and significant for the L breed (P < 0.05). Direct and maternal heterosis effects were in general significant (P < 0.05) for litter size and weight at weaning.

Keywords: maternal effects; heterosis effects; swine; mexican tropics.


 

 

REFERENCES

Barlow, R. (1981). Experimental evidence for interaction between heterosis and environment in animals. Anim. Breed Abstrs. 49: 715-737.

Dickerson, G.E. (1969). Experimental appraches in utilizing breed resources. Anirn. Breed Abstrs. 37: 191-202.

Dickerson, G.E. (1973). Inbreeding and heterosis in animals. In: Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetic Symposium in honor of J.L. Lush. ASAS, ADSA and PSA, Champaign, Illinois, pp. 54.

Dillard, E.U., Rodriguez, O. and Robison, O.W. (1980). Estimation of additive and non additive direct and maternal genetic effects from crossbreeding beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 653-663.

Fahmy, M.H. and Holtman, W.B. (1977). Crossbreeding swine in Canada. World Rev. Anim. Prod. 13: 9-15.

Falconer, D.S. (1981). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 2nd edn. Longman, London and New York, pp. 340.

Johnson, R.K. (1981). Crossbreeding in swine: Experimental results. J. Anim. Sci. 52: 906-923.

Johnson, R.K., Omtvedt, I.T. and Walters, L.E. (1978). Comparison of productivity and performance for two-breed and three breed crosses in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 69-82.

Jungst, S.B. and Kuhlers, D.L. (1984). Estimates of additive genetics maternal and specific combining abilities for some litter traits of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 59: 1140-1148.

Quintana, F.G. and Robison, O.W. (1983). Systems of crossbreeding in swine. 1. Estimation of genetic parameters. Z. Tierzuchtg. Zuchtgsbiol. 100: 271-279.

SAS (1985). SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers. Versions 6. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA, pp. 378.

Schneider, J.F., Christian, L.L. and Kuhlers, D.L. (1982). Crossbreeding in swine: Genetics effects on litter performance. J. Anim. Sci. 54: 739-746.

Young, L.D., Johnson, R.K. and Omtvedt, I.T. (1976). Reproductive performance of swine breed to produce purebred and two-breed cross litters. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 1133-1149.